AQCAN Exchange|Minnesota Supreme Court weighs whether a woman going topless violates an indecent exposure law

2025-04-29 18:00:04source:SafeX Pro Exchangecategory:Scams

ST. PAUL,AQCAN Exchange Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota woman’s misdemeanor conviction for going topless in public should be overturned because female breasts are not defined as “private parts” by the state’s indecent exposure statute, her attorney told the state Supreme Court.

Eloisa Plancarte was convicted after police said they found her topless at a convenience store parking lot in Rochester in 2021. She was sentenced to 90 days in jail.

Plancarte’s attorney, Adam Lozeau, told the Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday that the conviction should be reversed because she “didn’t expose a prohibited part of her body,” the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported.

Plancarte previously challenged the conviction before the state’s Court of Appeals, arguing that she had the same right to expose her chest in public as men. A three-judge panel rejected her appeal in a 2-1 decision.

Previous court rulings have labeled public toplessness by women but not men as indecent exposure, said Jim Haase, senior assistant county attorney for Olmsted County. The state law protects women who are breastfeeding from indecent exposure charges, which Haase said is evidence that female breasts are considered private parts under Minnesota law.

It’s unclear when the Minnesota Supreme Court will issue a ruling.

More:Scams

Recommend

Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas State Police are investigating the death of an Arkansas woman whos

FDA database that tracks heart device harms may miss red flags, safety experts warn

Too old and too sick for a heart transplant, Arvid Herrman was given a choice: Have a mechanical pum

Appeals court says Mark Meadows can’t move Georgia election case charges to federal court

ATLANTA (AP) — A federal appeals court on Monday ruled that former Trump White House chief of staff